Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New package: CAP v0.1.0 #118365

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JuliaRegistrator
Copy link
Contributor

UUID: d64df2ee-d2bb-46f4-8cbc-f03bb858f8cb
Repo: https://github.com/homalg-project/CAP.jl.git
Tree: 02bf1d535850ff173a9d1a566c18a5a06ccaad87

Registrator tree SHA: 17aec322677d9b81cdd6b9b9236b09a3f1374c6a
Copy link
Contributor

Hello, I am an automated registration bot. I help manage the registration process by checking your registration against a set of AutoMerge guidelines. If all these guidelines are met, this pull request will be merged automatically, completing your registration. It is strongly recommended to follow the guidelines, since otherwise the pull request needs to be manually reviewed and merged by a human.

1. New package registration

Please make sure that you have read the package naming guidelines.

2. AutoMerge Guidelines which are not met ❌

  • Name does not meet all of the following: starts with an upper-case letter, ASCII alphanumerics only, not all letters are upper-case.

  • Name is not at least 5 characters long

  • Package name similar to 24 existing packages.

    Similar package names
    1. Similar to GAP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 is at or below cutoff of 2. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 between lowercased names is at or below cutoff of 1. Normalized visual distance 0.70 is at or below cutoff of 2.50.
    2. Similar to Clp. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 1 between lowercased names is at or below cutoff of 1.
    3. Similar to GCP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    4. Similar to DSP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    5. Similar to CRC. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    6. Similar to C3D. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    7. Similar to BAT. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    8. Similar to COPT. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    9. Similar to Cxx. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    10. Similar to PAPI. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    11. Similar to Cbc. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    12. Similar to XAM. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    13. Similar to CSV. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    14. Similar to RAI. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    15. Similar to CAOS. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    16. Similar to MAT. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    17. Similar to WAV. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    18. Similar to CGAL. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    19. Similar to FCA. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    20. Similar to CSDP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    21. Similar to DAQP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    22. Similar to XPA. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    23. Similar to UMAP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.
    24. Similar to SCIP. Damerau-Levenshtein distance 2 is at or below cutoff of 2.

3. Needs action: here's what to do next

  1. Please try to update your package to conform to these guidelines. The General registry's README has an FAQ that can help figure out how to do so.
  2. After you have fixed the AutoMerge issues, simply retrigger Registrator, the same way you did in the initial registration. This will automatically update this pull request. You do not need to change the version number in your Project.toml file (unless the AutoMerge issue is that you skipped a version number).

If you need help fixing the AutoMerge issues, or want your pull request to be manually merged instead, please post a comment explaining what you need help with or why you would like this pull request to be manually merged. Then, send a message to the #pkg-registration channel in the public Julia Slack for better visibility.

4. To pause or stop registration

If you want to prevent this pull request from being auto-merged, simply leave a comment. If you want to post a comment without blocking auto-merging, you must include the text [noblock] in your comment.

Tip: You can edit blocking comments to add [noblock] in order to unblock auto-merging.

@mohamed-barakat
Copy link

The CAP project was initiated in 2015 as part of two dissertations in computer algebra. CAP is the name of the core package. It is already part of the GAP distribution under this three-letter name. CAP.jl is now completely independent from GAP (and also from the registered GAP.jl). The package CAP.jl gives native Julia access to the core package of the CAP project, which, unlike GAP.jl, can finally run under Windows without the need of the linux subsystem. This will allow for a wider user base in computer algebra.

@JuliaTagBot JuliaTagBot added the AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. label Oct 30, 2024
@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Oct 30, 2024

[noblock] Not a fan of these three-letter acronyms as package names, but I suppose, having GAP, the "spin-off" CAP follows a pattern. So I guess this should be okay.

P.S.: But you'll need support from someone with full merge permissions, which isn't me

@mohamed-barakat
Copy link

[noblock] Not a fan of these three-letter acronyms as package names, but I suppose, having GAP, the "spin-off" CAP follows a pattern. So I guess this should be okay.

Thank you very much, Michael.

P.S.: But you'll need support from someone with full merge permissions, which isn't me

Do I need to contact a specific person?

@goerz
Copy link
Member

goerz commented Oct 30, 2024

After the three-day waiting periods ends, you can ask in the #pkg-registration channel on Slack

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AutoMerge: last run blocked by comment PR blocked by one or more comments lacking the string [noblock]. new package
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants